ST. PAUL (By Joe Klein,
Time) September 5, 2008
—
It was odd seeing John
McCain without snark. I
suspect his honorable, at
times moving, and in some
ways remarkable acceptance
speech will be judged
favorably by the public. It
was a reminder of what he
had once been as a
politician...and yet it did
feel flat after the
full-throttle bilge and
vitriol of Sarah Palin and
Rudy Giuliani the night
before. It also seemed more
a valedictory than an
acceptance speech — more the
end of a career than the
beginning of a presidency.
Why was it remarkable?
Because John McCain is.
"They broke me," he said
flatly, of the torture he
endured in the Hanoi Hilton.
It wasn't the first time
he'd said that — indeed, he
has been more specific: he
has admitted attempting
suicide after the North
Vietnamese twisted and
yanked the war crimes
confession out of him — but
it is bracing, all the same,
to hear a politician admit
weakness. Indeed, this was
the first time I'd ever
heard a presidential
candidate admit his party's
failure as comprehensively
as McCain did tonight:
"Instead of changing
Washington, Washington
changed us...We lost. We
lost your trust."
This is yet another McCain
gamble: he figures that the
only way the country will
elect a Republican after
eight years of scandal and
stupidity is to promise a
completely different
Republican party. His
essential message was right:
Washington does have to
catch up to the global
economy, shake loose the
bonds of the special
interests and industrial-age
bureaucracies. But there was
little in this speech that
indicated that he had any
idea how to do that besides
relying on his fierce sense
of righteousness. And the
Republican Party is what it
is: an overwhelmingly
Caucasian group of people —
93% of the delegates were
white — who cheer more
vociferously for tax cuts
than they do for country.
The vast middle of the
speech — the part after his
bracing introduction ("I
don't work for a party...I
work for you") and before he
told his prison camp stories
— was a half-hearted and
unadventurous slog through
the world of policy, a vivid
demonstration of how little
McCain cares about this
stuff. It was notable only
for the steady stream of
misrepresentations of Barack
Obama's positions:
Obama would "raise taxes,"
but McCain's own economic
advisor Douglas Holtz-Eakin
said last month, that
Obama's plan was a net tax
cut for most Americans.
Obama's health plan was a
"government run health care
system," which it isn't. It
isn't even mandatory. And
McCain's plan would actually
increase taxes for some — a
good idea, by the way, in a
more comprehensive system —
by limiting the
deductibility of
employer-provided health
benefits. He said Obama
opposed offshore drilling
and nuclear power, after an
audience of 40 million saw
Obama say last week that he
was open to both. Happily,
McCain didn't repeat the
canard that Obama wanted to
lose the war in Iraq — and
he kept his weapons sheathed
on Iran (apparently his
focus groups are saying the
same thing most others are:
people are tired of war,
war, war...)
There were a few admirable
ideas in the speech — an
emphasis on school choice
and limiting the power of
the teachers unions;
offering a form of wage
insurance for those who lose
high-paid factory jobs and
have to take low-pay service
jobs — but there weren't any
new ones. McCain's energy
plan sounded just like
Obama's, without the closing
of loopholes and tax breaks
for big oil companies that
Obama (and apparently Sarah
Palin, who passed a windfall
profits tax) favors. But he
failed to disarm Obama's
most potent criticism: that
he essentially favors the
same policies — especially
the economic policies — as
George W. Bush. And it
wasn't corruption that
caused those policies to
fail; it was the radical
orthodoxy of the vision.
In the end, the strongest
aspect of the speech may
have been the awkwardness of
the delivery. What we saw
tonight was the real John
McCain. But his offering was
thin for a country in a heap
of trouble. Given the
admitted failure of his
party, he didn't present
anything more than his own
integrity as an action plan.
And given the anger and
vitriol of his campaign —
given the scurrilous,
sarcastic speeches he
allowed to be delivered on
Wednesday night; given the
embarrassing antics and
media conspiracies spouted
by his staff — McCain's
reputation for integrity has
been badly damaged.
McCain's presence in our
public life has been, on
balance, a valuable thing.
His speech tonight gave
intimations of why that has
been so, but it lacked the
drive and creativity of a
true presidential
acceptance. He is the
standard-bearer of a failed
ideology — ironically, a
belief in 'me first' before
country — and tonight the
leap between what McCain
really cares about, and what
his party really believes,
proved too great a chasm for
an old warrior to bridge.