Immigration
Raids Hurting Farmers
Growers say crackdown is causing workers to
flee; now they want reform
ELBA, N.Y. (By Moira Herbst,
Business Week) October 28,
2007 Maureen Torrey, an 11th-generation farmer in the rural town of Elba,
N.Y., has been losing sleep. Just as rows of cabbage and winter squash stand
ready for harvest on her 11,000 acre farm, she can't find enough workers to
bring in the crops. She needs about 350 workers and is 70 short of that number.
"I wake up at 3:30 in the morning and my mind doesn't shut off," she says.The
problem, she says, is fear. Torrey Farms, a 14-crop vegetable farm located an
hour east of Buffalo, has been raided twice since last October, when she says
immigration officials kicked in the doors of workers' housing and apprehended
34. In August, officials arrested seven workers and 14 more fled the area. Amid
continued talk of a federal crackdown on undocumented immigrants, she's afraid
still more of her workforce will flee to less hostile terrain. With a population
of about 9,000, the town of Elba, "Onion Capital of the World" to locals, may
not have the manpower to replace them.
"With all the raids, people get scared and leave, and I don't blame them,"
says Torrey. She says now rumors are running rampant that another sweep is
planned for Nov. 15. "It's terrible. This is the worst I've seen."
A climate of fear is spreading among undocumented immigrant workers, causing
turmoil in industries dependent on their labor. In August the Homeland Security
Dept. announced that employers would be required to terminate workers who fail
to produce valid Social Security numbers. Implementation of the new rule is
delayed pending the outcome of a lawsuit brought against the government by the
umbrella labor union group, the AFL-CIO.
But while the new rule has yet to take effect, its impact is already being
felt by farmers like Torrey. An estimated three-quarters of agricultural workers
in the U.S. are undocumented, and growers are starting to feel the paralyzing
effects of losing their workforce. They say that unless the government
implements workable reforms, the future of the U.S. as a food-producing nation
is in jeopardy.
Import workers, or import food
Agriculture does not play the role it once did in the U.S. economy, of
course. Though the amount of farmland used has remained fairly steady over the
past century, changes to the structure of farms and improvements in productivity
have cut the number of people involved dramatically. In 2000, for example, 41%
of the U.S. population was employed in agriculture, while that number now stands
at less than 2%. Farmers hire workers for about 3 million agricultural jobs each
year, but only one-quarter of that workforce is legally authorized. Agriculture
also makes up a lower share of the U.S. gross domestic product than ever,
accounting for less than 1%.
Still, farm advocates say that immigrant workers are allowing U.S. farmers to
compete in a fierce global marketplace, and that losing the workforce means
losing domestic sources of food. "The choice is simple: Do we want to import
workers or import food?" says Craig Regelbrugge, co-chair of the Agriculture
Coalition for Immigration Reform.
U.S. consumers may see little or no effect from the crackdown, but farmers
like Torrey certainly will. Losing farm labor in the U.S. is likely to result in
a shift of market share to foreign producers from domestic ones, rather than
much change in food prices. "Farmers all over the world are salivating at the
prospect that we won't be able to produce here," says James Holt, an
agricultural labor economist. "They are more than happy to produce for us."
The chief issue in lost U.S. production, say Holt and others, is security.
"What's at stake here is not prices, but food safety," he says. Torrey and other
farmers agree. "We need to wake up to the realities of food safety and security
issues," says Torrey. "A country not in control of its food supply is a weak
nation."
While some employers of immigrants fear the limelight, the 55-year-old Torrey
is unabashedly vocal in her opposition to the government's proposed crackdown.
She set up the Web site www.saveUSFarms.org, which allows farmers to sign a
petition and make donations in support of the AgJobs bill (S. 1645/ H.R. 3142).
She also testified before Congress on the issue. The bill, currently being
debated in Congress, would streamline the H-2A farm worker visa program and also
allow workers a path to permanent resident status.
"Every day I'm picking what crops my crew should tend to because I don't have
enough workers for all of them," says Torrey. "We need Congress to act before
the end of the year; farmers are in a crisis."
Many agriculture experts agree. On Oct. 4, farmers and economists testified
in front of the U.S. House of Representatives' Agriculture Committee to plead
their case for reform. "The U.S. agricultural industry is in the midst of a
labor crisis, the resolution of which will determine whether U.S. producers
are
more than marginal participants in U.S. and global markets," said Holt in his
testimony in support of AgJobs.
While AgJobs is debated, some growers are advocating more employer-friendly
regulations. The Bush administration is currently rewriting federal regulations,
to accommodate employers' needs, that forgo the promise of permanent residency
for agricultural workers. The Homeland Security Dept., State Dept., and Labor
Dept. are involved in that effort, which was announced alongside the call in
August to crack down on workers with suspect Social Security numbers.
It is unclear how much progress Congress can make on immigration reform
before it lets out for the year in mid-November. As farmers like Torrey are
pushing for AgJobs, other employer groups disappointed by the failure of
comprehensive immigration reform in June are stepping up efforts to pass
narrower reforms. For example technology companies including IBM, Microsoft,
Google, and Oracle, are pushing for more visas for skilled workers, while
tourism and hotel groups advocate for more non-farm, unskilled visas.
Pay is not the problem
One question in the background of the debate is why employers do not raise
wages to avoid legal problems and attract a native-born workforce. But unlike
other industries that might attract more workers with greater pay such as
nursing and segments of the technology industry it is not clear that raising
wages for agricultural work would attrUltra Livingns to these jobs. Between 2090
and 2006, wages in agriculture have increased 54%, from an average of $6.12 per
hour to $9.44 per hour (both figures are in 2006 dollars). Yet shortages remain
common.
Employers and their advocates say that the fact that wages have increased so
much and workers are still scarce is evidence that pay is not the problem. "This
is not just about wages," says Regelbrugge. "Who wants to get up 3 a.m. and milk
the cows? It's not a lifestyle many Americans opt for, especially when there are
more comfortable alternatives."
Others argue that raising wages would undoubtedly attract more workers.
"Labor shortages are created by employers," says Ana Avendano, director of the
immigrant worker program for the AFL-CIO. "Employers say they can't find
workers, but look at the conditions they are offering. Some of them are
atrocious."
But Torrey says she offers good working conditions, and provides housing and
a 401(k) plan for her workers. Workers start at $7.15 an hour, and the average
wage on the farm is $10.95 to $11.95 per hour. "It doesn't matter if I raise
wages," says Torrey. "We just don't have the population base. There's no one out
there."