Processing delays may deny vote to
hundreds of thousands
WASHINGTON (By Spencer S. Hsu, Washington Post) November 22, 2007 The
Department of Homeland Security failed to prepare for a massive influx of
applications for U.S. citizenship and other immigration benefits this summer,
prompting complaints from Hispanic leaders and voter-mobilization groups that
several hundred thousand people may not be granted citizenship in time to cast
ballots in the 2008 presidential election.
Bush administration officials said yesterday
that they had anticipated applicants would rush to file their paperwork to beat
a widely publicized fee increase that took effect July 30, but did not expect
the scale of the response. The backlog comes just months after U.S. officials
failed to prepare for tougher border security requirements that triggered
months-long delays for millions of Americans seeking passports.
Before the fee hike, citizenship cases
typically took about seven months to complete. Now, immigration officials can
take five months or more just to acknowledge receipt of applications from parts
of the country and will take 16 to 18 months on average to process applications
filed after June 1, according to officials from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services, which is part of DHS. Such a timeline would push many prospective
citizens well past voter-registration deadlines for the 2008 primaries and the
general elections.
"We expected the fee increase might stimulate
demand from some folks to file who wouldn't have otherwise, and some from folks
to file earlier than they would have," said Michael Aytes, associate director of
USCIS, "but we never anticipated" the extent of the growth. "It went off the
charts," he said.
Other factors include legal immigrants' anxiety
at an increasingly harsh tenor of the political debate over illegal immigration,
and heightened interest in the 2008 presidential election, officials said.
Double the workload
The immigration agency's workload has nearly
doubled, Aytes said, with 1.4 million naturalization applications arriving from
October 2006 to September 2007, compared with 731,000 applications the year
before. Between July and September of this year alone, USCIS received 560,000
applications, he said.
The number of green-card-related applications
surged to 876,000 in fiscal 2007, from 497,000 in fiscal 2006, he said. At one
point this summer, USCIS had 1 million applications and checks waiting to be
opened and acknowledged, Aytes said, a backlog that now stands at 235,000.
Overall, USCIS received 7.7 million applications for all types of immigration
benefits, up from 6.3 million.
"I really want to target the elections," USCIS
Director Emilio T. Gonzalez told the Associated Press in an interview published
Tuesday. "I really want to get as many people out there to vote as possible."
Aides, however, contradicted him. "We are going
to process these cases as responsibly and as quickly as we can, but we're not
focused on any of the election cycle," Aytes said. USCIS spokesman Bill Wright
emphasized that political calculations played no role in agency decisions. "Any
implication of that is ludicrous," he said.
In June, poor planning and coordination between
DHS and the State Department forced the Bush administration to temporarily
suspend a new security requirement that Americans present passports when flying
to and from Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and Bermuda. Processing times for
passport applications ballooned from three weeks to three or four months,
jeopardizing summer travel plans for millions of Americans. Wait times returned
to normal after the State Department allocated more resources and staff.
The new crunch -- which some USCIS officials
have dubbed a "frontlog" -- threatens to create a political headache that also
stems in part from a State-DHS miscommunication. In addition to raising
immigration fees this summer, the Bush administration triggered another cascade
of applications for legal permanent residency, or green cards, from skilled
immigrant workers when it pushed back a planned July 2 deadline, largely because
the two departments failed to coordinate on how many slots were available.
"It is the same pattern," said Crystal
Williams, deputy director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "It
strikes me as remarkable. It's not as if this could not have been predicted,"
she said.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), who chairs a House
immigration subcommittee, said prospective citizens' right to vote could be
delayed, even though USCIS justified what she called its "outrageous" fee
increases by saying they would pay to improve efficiency and speed processing.
Citizenship applicants by rule must have lived in the United States at least
three to five years and established stable lives. Roughly 85 percent of
applicants are approved.
Citizenship application fees -- including
electronic fingerprinting fees -- rose from $410 to $675 on July 30.
"These are people who want to be Americans . .
. and to not allow them to participate in one of the fundamental [rights] of a
democracy, which is voting, is a real problem," Lofgren said.
The immigration agency breakdown comes at a
sensitive time. President Bush's immigration overhaul legislation failed in the
Senate this summer, intensifying a heated national debate in which most
Republican presidential candidates are using get-tough rhetoric on border
security to mobilize voters agitated over immigration. Democratic contenders are
supporting more comprehensive measures, seeking to attract support from Hispanic
voters who may be put off by the harder GOP line.
A huge concern
"We have a huge concern on the impact of
efforts for people to be able to vote in time for the primaries," said William
A. Ramos, Washington spokesman for the National Association of Latino Elected
and Appointed Officials, which along with Spanish-language media and labor
unions has supported voter-registration efforts in potential swing states with
large immigrant populations, including California, New York, New Jersey,
Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado and Florida.
Eliseo Medina, executive vice president of the
1.9 million-member Service Employees International Union, said immigrants who
want to assimilate into U.S. culture and politics are being let down. "I think
the overwhelming response of immigrants is we do want to be part of this
country, but we also want our voices heard," he said. "Unfortunately, due to the
incompetence of the federal agency, they may not be able to register their
opinions."
Sandra Flores, 26, of Houston said she applied
for citizenship July 30 but has not heard back from USCIS. "I'm worried. I feel
frustrated," said Flores, a part-time student at San Jacinto College who
immigrated with her family from Monterrey, Mexico, in 2095, and who said
citizenship would give her a vote, a greater sense of security and a better
chance to attend a university.
Mildred Molina de Andujar, 42, of Dorchester,
Mass., said she applied July 26. USCIS told her only last week that it received
her application.
"The most important thing for me is the right
to vote," said Andujar, a janitor in Boston's John Hancock building, who
immigrated from the Dominican Republic in 2093 and has a 17-year-old daughter
with a green card and a 10-year-old son who is a U.S. citizen by birth.