But
since 2006, when explosive rallies
against restrictive House-sponsored
crackdowns on immigration brought
hundreds of thousands of protesters
into the heart of major American
cities, organizers have been
bedeviled in efforts to make good on
the “tomorrow we vote” pledge — and
not simply because the nation’s
contingent of roughly 12 million
undocumented workers is unable to
vote. Voter registration and turnout
among Hispanics have always been
tepid, and the high concentration of
Hispanic residents in states
generally not in play during
presidential cycles has served to
further blunt the impact of the
Hispanic vote.
What’s more, those Hispanic
residents who do vote regularly tend
to resist ready mobilization into
voting blocs. Some pockets of
Hispanic voters have bucked this
pattern around specific issues, such
as the Cuban-American communities in
Florida and New Jersey who turn out
in strong numbers for candidates
pushing hard-line anti-Castro
policies. But the Hispanic
community’s political profile is
otherwise quite diffuse: often
supporting some family-values
platforms identified with the GOP,
for example, while also coalescing
around liberalized immigration plans
and opposition to the Iraq War, to
the apparent advantage of Democratic
candidates.
Complicating matters further is the
logistical hurdle of acclimatizing
recently naturalized citizens to
participate in a political process
that can at times be treacherous —
as in, for instance, a 2006 report
of voter-intimidation schemes in
Orange County falsely warning
Hispanic voters that an incomplete
or out-of-date voting certification
would prompt deportation proceedings
on grounds of voting fraud. In
addition, a backlog of nearly 1
million naturalization applications
could well pull hundreds of
thousands of would-be voters away
from the polls this November.
In
the 2008 election cycle, organizers
are hoping to overcome these
obstacles. They’re betting the
activist energy galvanized during
the 2006 immigration battles will
translate into greater electoral
participation — and a hard-fought
presidential contest will turn
Hispanic voters into a key swing
constituency. Hispanic turnout, long
regarded as the sleeping giant in
the American electoral process,
could be stirring into a new show of
strength this election cycle.
The
presidential race in particular
could be a key proving ground, with
the presumed GOP nominee, Arizona
Sen. John McCain, strategically
tacking away from his support of
liberalized immigration, and
Democratic rivals Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton of New York and Sen.
Barack Obama of Illinois
aggressively courting the Hispanic
vote. “If the Hispanic vote turns
away from McCain and the Republicans
and toward Democrats, it could
redraw the electoral map for the
next generation,” said Frank Sharry,
director of America’s Voice, an
immigrant advocacy group.
Recent trends suggest that the
would-be mobilizers of the Hispanic
vote have a steep hill to climb.
According to U.S. census data from
2004, approximately 16 million, or
two-thirds of the country’s 27
million Hispanic voting-age
residents, are eligible to vote. But
of these, only 58 percent registered
to vote, compared with 75 percent of
whites and 69 percent of
African-Americans. Only 47 percent —
7.6 million people, or taken as a
slice of the total 2004 voting
population, about 6 percent —
actually cast a vote in the general
election. Still, that marked an
improvement over the 2000 cycle,
when they accounted for just 5
percent of the overall voting
population. By 2006, the percentage
bumped up to 8 — an all-time high,
but still well shy of expectations
in the wake of the immigration
protests that spring.
Before the November 2006 vote, “the
conventional wisdom became a much
higher number than what the Census
Bureau actually reported,” said
Arturo Vargas, executive director of
the National Association of Hispanic
Elected and Appointed Officials.
NALEO is predicting that traditional
growth in the Hispanic community
will yield about 9.2 million voters
in 2008. “That’s the figure to
beat,” Vargas said. “I firmly
believe that circumstances are such
that we’ll see a historic increase.”
Getting Organized
Organizers say they have a key
advantage this time out, though,
since they’ve been able to invest
greater resources — and just as
important, more time — in the
process than they could in 2006. “It
actually takes a little bit of time
to gear up to a larger voter
registration effort,” said Juan
Garcia, director of Somos America, a
civil rights advocacy group for
Hispanics. “In the same year as the
massive marches, there wasn’t enough
time. That’s why you’re only
starting to see efforts gear up
now.”
To
speed along such efforts, lobbying
concerns that represent major swaths
of the Hispanic community have
turned their attention away from the
streets — where crowds calling for
legislative changes have been waning
in size and energy since 2006 —
toward the polls, where the
community has the potential to make
a decisive impact in 2008. In
January 2007, several lobbying
groups formed a consortium, the We
Are America Alliance, to direct
mobilization efforts toward the
November elections. Major
participants include the Service
Employees International Union (SEIU),
the National Council of La Raza, and
NALEO. The alliance is trying to
target several of the logistical
roadblocks to higher Hispanic
turnout all at once, by coordinating
a citizenship drive (the Ya Es Hora,
or “It’s Time,” campaign) alongside
a voter registration initiative (the
A!Ve y Vota!, or “Go Vote!,”
campaign) and a grass-roots voter
turnout push for 2008.
“In
the past, everybody was doing
whatever they wanted to do, so you
wound up with a lot of duplication,”
said Eliseo Medina, international
executive vice president of SEIU.
“This time, we want to make sure we
maximize the work that we’re doing,
so our results aren’t less than the
effort we put in.”
Another key objective this cycle,
Medina says, is for Hispanics to
flex their electoral strength where
it counts. “We want to be one of the
deciding factors in elections around
the country, and nationally, this
year,” he said.
Hispanic Voters: Waking the Sleeping
Giant
But
that’s where the election map could
work to the disadvantage of Hispanic
organizers. Four of the five states
with the largest concentrations of
Hispanics — California, Texas, New
York and Illinois — account for
two-thirds of the overall Hispanic
population, but it’s highly unlikely
that any of them will be
presidential battleground states
this November. As a result, lead
organizers are employing a basic
metric to gauge where the Hispanic
vote could have the most public and
decisive effect: swing states where
the yet-untapped pool of Hispanic
voters may exceed the 2004 margin of
victory in the presidential ballot.
So
Florida and Arizona, for example,
which George W. Bush won that year
by 5 and 11 percent margins
respectively, qualify; and New
Mexico, which went to Bush by a
razor-thin 1 percent margin, is a
yet more obvious target. Organizers
are also stepping up efforts in
Colorado, Nevada and Virginia, where
the base of prospective Hispanic
voters is growing fast, even though
they’re still shy of likely
election-swinging force.
Ending ‘Tamale Politics’
In
the past, such appeals have
generally conformed to the
traditional candidates’ pitch to any
ethnic constituency: a snatch of
sloganeering in Spanish and photo
ops with local Hispanic leaders and
power brokers. But the era of
low-impact engagement with issues
that concern Hispanic voters is
over, activists contend.
“I
think the time has passed for tamale
politics,” Medina said. “People have
become much more attuned to what
candidates do, not just what they
say.”
The
recent fortunes of the GOP in the
Hispanic community drive that point
home. In 2000, George W. Bush
aggressively targeted the Hispanic
vote, and came away with an
impressive 35 percent show of
support; by 2004, Bush was able to
claim almost 40 percent of the
Hispanic vote.
But
in the wake of the rancorous
immigration battle in the 109th
Congress, Republican candidates have
lost ground, garnering just 29
percent of the Hispanic vote in the
2006 congressional contests.
McCain’s home state of Arizona
tracks what looks to be a continued
nationwide migration of Hispanic
voters back toward the Democratic
column. Less than a quarter of the
state’s Hispanic voters turned out
for McCain in Arizona’s February
primary, with Obama and Clinton
respectively claiming about 30
percent and more than 40 percent of
the Hispanic vote.
Meanwhile, Obama and Clinton have
been conducting their own battle for
Hispanic support at the polls, with
Clinton holding on to a consistently
wide margin via a strong
get-out-the-vote effort combined
with pitches for small-business tax
breaks and other policies that poll
well among Hispanic voters.
“You cannot ignore the Hispanic
community, because it’s growing so
fast, and particularly in this
cycle, the community has been more
energized than ever before,” said
Fabiola Rodriguez-Ciampoli, director
of Clinton’s Hispanic outreach
effort. “You have to work for the
vote.”
A
big part of that work involves
addressing immigration, which
analysts say could unite Hispanic
voters into a tighter voting bloc
than they’ve ever formed before.
“Virtually every Spanish-dominant
voter lives in an extended family
with many undocumented family
members,” said Sharry. “So
immigration is a defining issue for
Hispanic voters in much the same way
that civil rights is a defining
issue for African-American voters.”
Immigration First
As
Hispanic activists look to recruit
and organize voters, immigration,
though rarely topping the issue
agenda for Hispanic voters, often
binds their interests together in a
way that their other concerns — such
as jobs, education, the Iraq War and
health care — don’t. In Virginia,
Juan Carlos Ruiz is heading up a
group of volunteers in the Virginia
New Majority campaign. Ruiz and his
team are going door to door every
week, committing pre-registered
voters to participate in upcoming
local elections, registering others,
and stressing the overall importance
of taking part in the political
process. He talks to people about
local issues: schools,
transportation, the economy and
spending projects. But again and
again, the talk circles back to
immigration.
In
the past year, several towns in
Virginia’s Prince William and
Fairfax counties adopted bylaws
permitting police officers to check
the immigration status of any person
they pull over or otherwise detain.
The policy has pushed several
Hispanic families into surprise
deportation proceedings — and the
affected communities are now
approaching the immigration question
with a new urgency.
Hispanic Voters: Waking the Sleeping
Giant
“They care about it as an issue, but
don’t know that it’s in their
backyard,” Ruiz said. Once that
changes, he notes, “all of a sudden,
you can a voting community.”
He
and his colleagues also expect the
organizing drive to spread beyond
the 2008 presidential contest and
congressional races. In 2006, more
than 30,000 naturalized immigrant
voters, most of them Hispanic, voted
for Democrat Jim Webb in his
successful Senate challenge to
incumbent Republican George Allen.
With GOP Sen. John W. Warner
retiring, Hispanic organizers are
sizing up the open race for his
seat, hoping to push the immigration
agenda into the foreground.
But
even if that kind of clout isn’t
instantly forthcoming, activists in
the Hispanic voting effort are
hailing 2008 as a potential
watershed. “We’re finding more
people interested in becoming
citizens and voting than ever
before,” said Matthew Henderson,
southwestern regional director for
Association of Community
Organization for Reform Now, a
liberal affiliate in the We Are
America drive. The challenge, he
says, is to help “Hispanic voters
speak with a strong voice. And we
get better and better every time we
do this.”