Anti-immigration Fervor may Fade
in Election
PHOENIX
(By Tim Gaynor, Reuters) February 9,
2008 — What a difference a few weeks
make — at least when it comes to the
U.S. presidential campaign and the hot
issue of immigration.
When
the White House race began in earnest
with the first party nominating contests
in Iowa in January, a broad field of
Republican candidates vied to
demonstrate their toughness on
undocumented immigration, pledging more
border enforcement and a crackdown on
undocumented workers.
But
with a narrowing of the races to secure
the Republican and Democratic
nominations ahead of November's general
election, the issue could slip lower
down the agenda as far as the candidates
are concerned, analysts say.
"Looking forward to the general
election, it's not that immigration is
going to be redefined, it's just going
to go away," predicted Steven Camarota,
research director of the Center for
Immigration Studies think-tank, which
advocates reduced immigration.
Sen.
John McCain emerged from coast-to-coast
"Super Tuesday" nominating contests as
the most likely Republican candidate and
all but sealed the deal when his nearest
rival, Mitt Romney, pulled out on
Thursday.
McCain
— viewed as soft on undocumented
immigration by his conservative critics
— co-sponsored a comprehensive
immigration overhaul that was nixed by
the Senate in June. His position earned
McCain the lasting enmity of many
Republican voters who will likely push
him to take a harder line.
On the
Democratic side, the race is down to
Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary
Clinton, who fought to a virtual draw in
the February 5 voting. They both favor
measures set out in the failed
immigration bill, which sought to
combine tougher border security with a
path to legal status for many of the 12
million undocumented immigrants living
in the shadows.
Early
Republican front-runner Romney, who ran
terse television advertisements
promising get-tough measures on
undocumented immigrants, is now out of
the race. Mike Huckabee, who got
endorsement from the Minutemen civilian
border patrol group, is now seen as
extremely unlikely to stop McCain.
"With
Romney and Huckabee fading away, you
essentially have different flavors of
the same proposal," said Mark Jones, a
political science professor at Rice
University in Texas.
Taking the middle ground
The
question of what to do with millions of
undocumented immigrants has been a
hot-button topic for months in the
United States, and consistently ranks
among the top three issues for voters,
alongside the economy and the war in
Iraq.
Many
Americans see undocumented immigrants as
a drain on jobs and resources such as
schools and health care. With a
recession looming, anti-immigrant
feeling may intensify.
Others
argue that most work undocumented
immigrants hard in often low-paid jobs
that would otherwise go unfilled.
The
candidates who are eventually picked to
run for president by each party may try
to avoid discussing immigration,
although they are unlikely to be
successful. When forced to address the
issue, they could seek the hitherto
elusive middle ground, analysts said.
"Presidential candidates from both
parties are going to want to avoid it,
and when they can't avoid it, they are
going to want to straddle," said Tamar
Jacoby, a senior research fellow at the
Manhattan Institute think-tank, who
supported the bipartisan Senate
immigration bill.
"If you
go too far in the restrictionist
direction it's going to lose you
Hispanics, if you go too far in the
pro-immigration direction, it's going to
lose you some backlash voters," she
added.
The
problem is especially acute for McCain,
who needs the votes of his party's
strident anti-immigration wing and will
be under intense pressure to toughen his
position.
The
issue is certain to loom large in the
race for Congress, where all 435 seats
in the House of Representatives are up
for grabs on November 4, as well as 35
Senate seats and 11 state governorships.
"Republicans running for .... Congress
and state and local offices, almost all
of them are going to run on undocumented
immigration," said Frank Sharry, of the
National Immigration Forum.
"Whereas
most Americans think mass deportations
are unrealistic and undesirable, there's
a significant number of Republicans who
think it is a desirable policy."