After Bill Falls,
Republicans will Pay in Hispanic Votes
LOS
ANGELES (By Jennifer Steinhauer, NYTimes) July 1, 2007 — Many Republican
lawmakers returned to their home districts in triumph this week, having beat
back a comprehensive immigration bill that many of their constituents had
denounced as untenable.
But the bill’s demise may have greatly
damaged the party’s ability to meet its enduring goal of attracting a large
percentage of the growing number of Hispanic voters — thousands of whom are
ostensibly in line with the party on a host of other issues, said many
Republican lawmakers, consultants and Hispanic voters.
“There may be some short-term gain from
this,” said Linda Chavez, who served in the Reagan administration and is now
chairwoman of the Center for Equal Opportunity, a conservative public policy
group. “But in the long term, it is disastrous for the Republican Party.”
The complex political dynamic that formed
the failure of the immigration bill — one that sought to give legal status
to millions of illegal immigrants while providing enhanced security to the
nation’s borders — went far beyond partisan alliances.
Several Republicans, notably Senator Mel
Martinez of Florida helped write the bill and defended it. But other
Republicans led the opposition to kill it. They were joined by some
Democrats — some who held views similar to the Republican opponents of the
bill, but also by liberals who felt that the bill’s provisions were too
onerous.
In some cases, views of the bill were
formed more along regional than party lines, with unlikely allies like
businesses interests and immigrants’ rights groups. Its champion was a
conservative president.
Yet in terms of the politics of perception,
Hispanics may have been deeply alienated by the heated rhetoric that wound
around the axle of the debate, most of it stemming from a few Republican
opponents and the loud echo chamber of talk radio.
“The tone of the debate, and the way it was
framed in sort of an ‘us against them’ way, has done great harm in wooing
Hispanics to the party,” said Ms. Chavez, who was the director of the United
States Commission on Civil Rights under Reagan.
For example, Senator Jeff Sessions of
Alabama, a leading opponent of the measure, at one point in the debate,
said, “The bill would provide amnesty and a path to citizenship for people
who broke into our country by running past the National Guard.”
“I think it’s bloody for the Republicans,”
said Antonio Gonzalez, president of the William C. Velasquez Institute, a
Hispanic-oriented research and policy organization with offices in San
Antonio and Los Angeles. “The Democrats said pro-immigrant stuff, and even
if they didn’t support it, it was because they said it wasn’t good enough.
The Republicans said anti-immigrant stuff and so now they are going to get
killed with this.”
It is a view that many Republicans share
“the Hispanic vote is turning against us in very large numbers,” expressed
similar thoughts privately this week, aides said.
In an interview on Friday, Mr. Martinez,
who is chairman of the national Republican Party, called the bill’s defeat
“a failure.” To win favor with Hispanics in the future, “We’ve got our work
cut out for us,” he said. “I consider it serious.”
Hispanics made up 8.6 percent of the
nation’s eligible voters in 2006, according to the Pew Hispanic Center in
Washington, up from 7.4 percent in 2000.
In some states, like New Mexico, Texas and
California, Hispanics make up well over 20 percent of eligible voters,
though that number is a significantly smaller share of the overall Hispanic
population than other ethnic groups, the center found. In 2004, according to
the research group, Hispanics made up 6 percent of all votes cast.
Republicans have showed signs of making
clear inroads in recent years among Hispanic voters. President Bush took
roughly 40 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004, and Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger of California won roughly the same percentage of Hispanic
voters in his state in his re-election in 2006 — a strong showing for any
Republican candidate here.
But the party saw only about 25 percent of
Hispanic voters come its way in the midterm elections last year, an alarming
trend for the Republicans looking at 2008. Many Republicans fear that loss
of essentially half their market share, though they were not willing to say
so on the record.
With about two-thirds of the nation’s
Hispanic residents living in nine of the states holding early Democratic
primaries — including California, where Hispanics hold more sway in the
party than in most other states — there is now an opportunity for Democrats
to seize on immigration as a wedge issue.
“You have to look at this in terms of
outreach,” said Adam Mendelsohn, communications director for Governor
Schwarzenegger. “I think that some of the rhetoric on the immigration debate
has a very negative impact in terms of potentially alienating different
constituencies. The governor said in his speech to Washington that we need
to cool the rhetoric. He feels that the debate was hurtful to his party and
the country as a whole.”
Alfredo Maciel, 72, who owns a clothing
alteration business in Costa Mesa, said in an interview in Orange County on
Friday “I don’t think Hispanics are interested in joining the Republicans,”
he said, “and I don’t think Republicans are interested in attracting them.”